cxcl16 neutralization (Bio X Cell)
Structured Review
![(A) <t>CXCL16</t> mRNA expression in the kidney during MuPyV infection. Expression is shown as fold change relative to sham infected samples. Data are from three independent experiments (n = 10-11). (B) Expression of NKCC2 [marks the ascending loop of Henle ], CD8, and CXCL16 in epithelia in sham-infected and 8 dpi kidneys; bottom right photomicrographs are merged images. Representative of two independent experiments. (C) CXCL16 expression in sham-infected, 4 dpi, and 8 dpi kidney lysates (left). Western blot image is representative of two independent experiments with each lane indicating protein lysate from kidneys of individual mice. Protein band intensity quantification for sCXCL16 was normalized to β-actin and analyzed by ImageLab and normalized to the loading control (right). Data are combined from two independent experiments (n = 3-5). (D) Experimental design of in vivo CXCL16 mAb administration. Mice were administered 250 µg of CXCL16 mAb or control rat IgG every two days from days 4-14 post infection and euthanized at 15 dpi. Numbers of CD45 mAb i.v.-negative, CD8 + CD44 + D b -LT359 tetramer + T cells and CD4 + CD44 + T cells in kidneys and spleens of infected mice given anti-CXCL16 or control rat IgG. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA (A and C) and by multiple Mann-Whitney tests (D).](https://pub-med-central-images-cdn.bioz.com/pub_med_central_ids_ending_with_2244/pmc11922244/pmc11922244__ppat.1012969.g002.jpg)
Cxcl16 Neutralization, supplied by Bio X Cell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 2 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/cxcl16 neutralization/product/Bio X Cell
Average 94 stars, based on 2 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "The CXCR6-CXCL16 axis mediates T cell control of polyomavirus infection in the kidney"
Article Title: The CXCR6-CXCL16 axis mediates T cell control of polyomavirus infection in the kidney
Journal: PLOS Pathogens
doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1012969
Figure Legend Snippet: (A) CXCL16 mRNA expression in the kidney during MuPyV infection. Expression is shown as fold change relative to sham infected samples. Data are from three independent experiments (n = 10-11). (B) Expression of NKCC2 [marks the ascending loop of Henle ], CD8, and CXCL16 in epithelia in sham-infected and 8 dpi kidneys; bottom right photomicrographs are merged images. Representative of two independent experiments. (C) CXCL16 expression in sham-infected, 4 dpi, and 8 dpi kidney lysates (left). Western blot image is representative of two independent experiments with each lane indicating protein lysate from kidneys of individual mice. Protein band intensity quantification for sCXCL16 was normalized to β-actin and analyzed by ImageLab and normalized to the loading control (right). Data are combined from two independent experiments (n = 3-5). (D) Experimental design of in vivo CXCL16 mAb administration. Mice were administered 250 µg of CXCL16 mAb or control rat IgG every two days from days 4-14 post infection and euthanized at 15 dpi. Numbers of CD45 mAb i.v.-negative, CD8 + CD44 + D b -LT359 tetramer + T cells and CD4 + CD44 + T cells in kidneys and spleens of infected mice given anti-CXCL16 or control rat IgG. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA (A and C) and by multiple Mann-Whitney tests (D).
Techniques Used: Expressing, Infection, Western Blot, Control, In Vivo, MANN-WHITNEY
Figure Legend Snippet: (A) Dense lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate surrounding and infiltrating cortical tubules (H&E, x400). (B) Immunohistochemical staining for Large T antigen in nuclei of tubular epithelium (x250). (C) Expression of CXCR6 on infiltrating CD8 + cells. Photomicrographs (right) are enlarged images in the white squares (left); bottom right are merged images. No 1 o , no primary antibody. (D) Log-fold change of CXCL16 and CXCR6 across four independent studies, each comparing KTx biopsies from patients with PVAN and stable graft function. The error bars indicate the 95% confidence interval of log-fold change, with horizontal dashed grey line indicating log-fold change = 0, or no difference. GSE120495 is an RNA-seq study, while remaining studies are microarray based. Given the heterogeneity of the data, a Cauchy combination method with uniform weights was employed to integrate the p-values across these studies. The combined p-values for CXCL16 = 0.000337 and CXCR6 = 2.72x10 -05 . ns, non-significant at adjusted p-value > 0.05; *, statistical significance at adjusted p-value ≤ 0.05; **, statistical significance at adjusted p-value ≤ 0.01; ***, statistical significance at adjusted p-value ≤ 0.001.
Techniques Used: Immunohistochemical staining, Staining, Expressing, RNA Sequencing, Microarray
Figure Legend Snippet: Summary of differential gene expression of CXCL16 and CXCR6 in four studies of KTx biopsies with PVAN. Because of the heterogeneity of the data (i.e., one RNA-seq, three microarray), a Cauchy combination method with uniform weights was employed to integrate the p-values across these studies. P-values significant after false discover rate (FDR) correction are bolded and italicized in the Adj. P-value column. Cauchy combined p-values < 0.05 are bolded and italicized.
Techniques Used: Gene Expression, Microarray

